THE EUROPEAN PORTFOLIO FOR STUDENT TEACHERS OF LANGUAGES (EPOSTL) PROMOTES PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: ELT IN-SERVICE TEACHERS’ VIEWS

Main Article Content

Meruyert Seitova

Abstract

In both pre-service and in-service teacher development, portfolios are used for a variety of purposes ranging from teacher education to development, stimulators for reflection and tools to plan and monitor competency and personal development. The European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) provides a tool for reflection and self-assessment for student teachers during their initial teacher education. It also assists curriculum development and course planning. Thus, this study tried to investigate the ELT in-service teachers’ views on the use of the EPOSTL to promote professional development at Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, in Kazakhstan. Upon the implementation of the EPOSTL in the ELT department, seven in-service teachers of English were interviewed through the questions prepared. The data gathered from interviews were analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings indicated that teachers found the use of the EPOSTL beneficial in terms of self-assessment and self-reflection. According to the findings, it is suggested that EPOSTL is not only useful for pre-service teachers but it is also very effective for in-service teachers.

Keywords: portfolio, EPOSTL (European portfolio for student teachers of languages), in-service teachers, professional development, self-assessment, self-reflection

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Meruyert Seitova, Hacettepe University, Turkey

PhD student at Hacettepe University ELT department Ankara, Turkey.

References

Burkert, A., & Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Focus on the student teacher: The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) as a tool to develop teacher autonomy. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 238-252.

Cakir, A., & Balcikanli, C. (2012). The use of the EPOSTL to foster teacher autonomy: ELT student teachers’ and teacher trainers views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online),37(1).

Cannell, C. F., & Kahn, R. L. (1968). Interviewing. The handbook of social psychology, 2, 526-595.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Glatthorn, A. (1995). “Teacher Development.” In International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. 2nd ed., edited by L. W. Anderson, 41–45. London: Pergamon.

Fenner, A. B. (2011). Chapter two the EPOSTL as tool for reflection Anne-Brit Fenner. Insights into the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL),29.

Holliday, A. (2007). Doing & writing qualitative research. Sage.

Horng, E., & Loeb, S. (2010). New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 66-69.

Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2011). The EPOSTL in Iceland: Getting the mentors on board. Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages, 9-17.

Jimbo, H., Hisamura, K., Oda, M., Usui, Y., &Yoffe, L. (2012). A comprehensive study on the framework of English language teachers’ professional development in Japan.

Loughran, J., & Corrigan, D. (1995). Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 565-577.

Mehlmauer-Larcher, B. (2009). Implementing the EPOSTL (European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages) in pre-service teacher education. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in English Language teaching, 91.

Mirici, I. H., &Demirbas, S. (2013). How to turn the EPOSTL into an electronic setting: The e-EPOSTL. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1368-1377.

Mirici,I.H.(2014) EFUESTE- Effective Use of the EPOSTL by Student Teachers of English project.

Mirici, I. H., &Hergüner, S. (2015). A digital European self-assessment tool for student teachers of foreign languages: The EPOSTL. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 1-10.

Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A.-B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H. and Soghikyan, K. (2007). European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (Draft). Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe.

Ogeyik, M.C. (2009). Attitudes of the student teachers in English language teaching programs towards microteaching technique. English Language Teaching, 2(3),205-212

Orlova, N. (2011). Reflecting on the use of the EPOSTL: Pre-service teachers voices. ELT: Converging Approaches and Challenges, 89.

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Ernst KlettSprachen.

Straková,Z.(2010). European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages and its Benefits for Pre-Service Teacher Training. In English matters, Preśovskáuniverzita v Preśove. Available at: http://www.pulib.sk/elpub2/FHPV/Kacmarov a1/index.html10/2010

Winsor, P. J., & Ellefson, B. A. (1995). Professional portfolios in teacher education: An exploration of their value and potential. The Teacher Educator, 31(1), 68-81.